The following contains information that is contrary to mainstream thinking on HIV and AIDS, but which is supported by scientific documentation. The following does not claim that HIV does not exist nor does it claim that AIDS does not exist, only that the two may not be related.
With the current lack of progress in the field, perhaps some different perspectives should be considered. There is now significant information to support these claims and a number of books have been published debunking the link between HIV and AIDS. This includes information supporting that, in reality, HIV may not be a real virus but is actually the result of data manipulation by members of the scientific community. If this claim is true, this may be one of the greatest scientific scams of all times, with billions of dollars wasted on false and manipulated research data. The HIV - AIDS world has already had several scandals, including falsification and misrepresentation of data.
Some sources, however, provide serious support to the claim that the presence of HIV is the result of poor laboratory technique and the manipulation of data to support its existance. In her book Science Sold Out: Does HIV really cause AIDS?, Rebecca Culshaw points out the extent to which HIV and AIDS data has been manipulated.
In reality, the actual HIV virus has never been isolated or proven to cause AIDS. While there are a few old textbooks that show images of a virus that they claim to be HIV, this is not proven. The isolation of a virus, using density gradient centrifugation, is considered to be the standard of virology for proving the existance of a virus. This has never happened with HIV, in any literature that I can find. Additionally, science has not been able to produce any effective vaccine for the HIV virus. They claim that this is because it changes but others claim that it is because the HIV virus does not actually exist. Considering the amount of money spent on HIV and AIDS every year, you might think that they would have isolated and proven the infectiousness of this virus after 25 years. This has not happened. The isolation of a virus using this method should only cost a few hundred thousand dollars out of the billions currently being spent? Why have they not done this?
Others have demonstrated that other viruses are active and cause death in many if not all AIDS patients. In his book, The Virus Within: A coming Epidemic, Nicholas Regush provides an extensive discusion of this virus and the work that is being forced into the background by HIV proponents.
The basis for determining the presence of HIV in an individual is composed of 3 main tests. The first is the ELISA test which looks for the presence of antibodies to any of ten different protein markers that may be present in the blood. The problem is that everyone has some of these markers so that the blood must be diluted 400 times in order to keep everyone from showing up as HIV positive. Supposedly, the dilution is to eliminate most of the false positives. According to the HIV-AIDS proponents, only those with high levels are of concern. This is absurd. The second test, the Western Blot WB test test uses electrophoresis to look for individual proteins, some of which are combinations of others. You can be considered HIV positive if you have 3, 4, or more positives, depending on where you are tested. This test supposedly eliminates some false positives. More garbage. The third test is the PCR or Polymerase Chain Reaction, which supposedly shows viral load. This test is just as rediculous as the others. It uses a chain reaction to amplify the amount of certain nucleic acids present in the blood and it is supposed to be specific, but it is not. All three of these test are miserable failures that have resulted in inaccurate branding of individuals as being HIV positive and AIDS prone.
The real problem with these tests is that they are not valid because they have not been compared to any viral infection. It is the standard of microbiology to follow Koch's postulates. These postulates specify that the organism causing an illness must not be found in healthy subjects and must be isolated from a diseased subject. This has not been done with HIV, especially since almost everyone carries at least some of the antigens. Even very healthy people do. The second step is to grow a pure culture of the organism. Obviously, this has not been done. The third step is to create the same illness in a healthy animal or cell culture using the purified organism. This definitely has not been done. Based on this, HIV is a farce and the public has been misled and is being fleeced for billions of dollars. Additionally, the fourth postulate requires the disease causing organism be obtained, purified, and identified as the same organism that caused the original disease. Also, none of the tests above has been approved by the FDA to determine the presence of HIV. They are approved for testing the blood supply only.
Since HIV has not been shown to exist or to cause AIDS, is there something else present that may cause these deaths? Yes, in almost all AIDS cases where death occurs and other organisms are checked for, there are at least four micro-organisms found to be present. Candida is almost always present and in most cases, it is massively present, causing serious damage to the intestines and other organs. Pneumocystis carinii is a yeast like fungus that causes a form of pneumonia and is persistantly present in HIV and AIDS cases. Cytomegalovirus is also commonly present and frequently causes death in AIDS patients. Finally, in almost every case that it is checked for, active HHV-6 infection is present in the bodies of AIDS victims after death, according to studies on autopsy materials. The problem is that this virus is considered basically innocuous because it is present in almost all humans. One form of this virus causes Roseola in children, how could it possibly cause AIDS? Read The Virus Within: A coming Epidemic.
One of the best known detractors of the HIV causes AIDS conspiracy is Peter Duesberg, who has been providing information to disprove this theory since the late 1980's. More information is on the Peter Duesberg website.
A number of sources now point to intestinal parasites as a major factor in the transmission of HIV infection and the subsequent transition to AIDS in HIV positive individuals as well as increasing the chance of other viral infections.
A discussion presented by Dr. Richard Bowman Pearce points out that between 80 percent and 100 percent of HIV infected individuals have some form of intestinal parasite present in their bodies. Also, HIV is rampant in areas such as Africa where there are large numbers of parasites and parasitic infections. Additionally, the strongest link between parasites and HIV appears to be protozoa which are difficult to detect in the stools and infection may go unnoticed for years.
A number of HIV research projects indicate that the elimination of parasites can augment hiv treatment and the reduction of viral load in HIV infected individuals. This is an indication that the markers identified as HIV may actually be parasite proteins. The reduction of parasitic illness can also improve the quality of hiv life by helping to overcome other viral disease associated with immune deficiency.
Additionally, it appears that the hiv virus and other viral illness such as viral pneumonia and viral meningitis may be succeptible to electronic pulses. It is noted that some viral illnesses such as colds and influenza are successfully stopped using these methods.
A significant financial reward has been offered for many years for the proof of the existance of the HIV virus and that it causes AIDS, according to Koch's postulated. This award has not been claimed.
See also: THE ISOLATION OF HIV -- HAS IT REALLY BEEN ACHIEVED? THE CASE AGAINST
For more information, see: The Other Side of AIDS